Towson, Md. (February 9, 2011): The National Science Foundation (NSF) has traditionally used two merit review criteria in determining which proposals are and are not funded: intellectual merit and broader impacts. Addressing the intellectual merit criterion is straightforward; investigators describe their research, explaining its need and its impact on the field. The broader impacts criterion is more difficult to address. In the past, investigators have been able to show impact through publishing and through presenting to colleagues at scientific meetings. Dissemination to other scientists is no longer sufficient, in and of itself, in addressing the broader impacts criterion; reviewers are now looking for outreach to and impact on the broader public rather than solely for impacts on the scientific community. According to Jonathan Lazar, professor of Computer and Information Sciences and a previous and current NSF principal investigator, Towson University faculty members applying to NSF need only look at what the university is already doing to address this criterion. “As a university focused on civic engagement, we have expertise in projects focusing on broader impacts. This is the core of who we are. ‘Broader impacts’ means service learning. It means STEM education. It means applied research. It means partnering with hospitals and medical providers. It means focusing on practical outcomes for the community.”
Office of Sponsored Programs & Research
|
|