The Internet Encyclopedia of International Relations
LAND-LOCKED STATES &THE LAW OF THE SEAE. Jill ParlettTowson University
As a result of depleting resources on land, nation states have begun looking
to the ocean as a new, diverse supply of raw materials such as petroleum
and mineral resources. This has raised the issue of giving land-locked
nations equal access to the sea and its resources. Erik Suy,
Under Secretary General of The Legal Counsel of the United Nations, states
that it is necessary to, “ensure that land-locked States are not left out
in the sharing process of these resources simply because of the geographical
disadvantage of lack of a sea coast suffered by them.” Due to this
expanding need, a body of law has been developed giving land-locked nations
the right of access to and from the sea, and freedom of transit to the
sea and its resources.
About one fifth of all States in the global community are land-locked. According to many international relations texts, land-locked States are defined as those having no seacoast whatsoever. In order to gain access to the sea, they must pass through one or more States called Transit States1/. Examples of land-locked nations include, but are not limited to: Botswana, Chad, Zambia, Austria, Hungary, Switzerland, Afghanistan, Mongolia, Nepal, Bolivia, and Paraguay. It is not a coincidence that the above list includes mostly less developed countries. As the United Nations Conference on Trade and Development (UNCTAD) concluded:
Land-locked developing countries are generally among the very poorest of the developing countries. The lack of a territorial access to the sea, compounded by remoteness and isolation from the world markets, appears to be an important cause of their relative poverty, and constitutes a major obstacle to their development. Indeed, all but four of the 20 land-locked developing countries are on the list of countries identified by the United Nations as the least developed (UN Doc. 1976: TD/191).Access to the sea for land-locked states is a vital and continuing need. The sea has been determined res communis, the common property of all, giving all states, whether coastal or not, the right to transit freely to and from it and navigate freely upon it (Churchill 1983: 178-179). In the past, there have been instances of transit being denied altogether, forcing land-locked nations to find alternative methods of transporting goods to and from the sea. Part X, Article 125 of the United Nations Convention on Law of the Sea states that, “land-locked States shall enjoy freedom of transit through the territory of transit States by all means
of
transport.” Article 127 states that, “Traffic in transit
shall not be subject to any customs duties, taxes or other charges except
charges levied for specific services rendered in connection with such traffic.”
This is to ensure that land-locked states are not further hindered economically
because of their geographical disadvantage.
One of the most disadvantageous features of being land-locked is the lack of a seaport. Seaports play a very important role in the development process of any country (Sinjela 1983: 69). Without a seaport, land-locked States must depend on the use of neighboring coastal States ports for their imports and exports. This leads to the issue of equal treatment in ports for land-locked States. Any deprivation or indirect refusal of access to ports is tantamount to a denial of freedom of the high seas (Sinjela 1983: 70). Efforts to grant equality in maritime ports date back to 1923 with the Statute of the Convention on International Regime of maritime ports. Article 131 of the 1980 Draft Convention on Law of the Sea states that, “Ships flying the flag of land-locked States shall enjoy treatment equal to that accorded to other foreign ships in maritime ports.” Bilateral agreements between coastal and land-locked States also allow for equal access for land-locked States to the sea via maritime ports. In fact, a document endorsed by the Trade and Development Board of UNCTAD pointed out that, “the use of international agreements has long been a successful instrument in promoting an efficient and reliable transit transport system and land-locked and transit developing countries should consider further enhancing efforts to adhere to those agreements.”
Part VII of the UNCLOS is dedicated to the high seas. According to the Convention, all nations reserve freedom of the high seas which includes, freedom of navigation, freedom of over flight, freedom to lay submarine cables and pipelines, freedom to construct artificial islands and other installations, freedom of fishing, and freedom of scientific research. The high seas is often defined as all parts of the sea that are not included in the exclusive economic zone, in the territorial sea or in the internal waters of a State, or in the archipelagic waters of an archipelagic State. Under the Convention, land-locked States are also granted freedom of innocent passage through a coastal State's territorial water in order to access the high seas.
When discussing land-locked
States, the topic of access to marine resources must be addressed.
As Roger Ravelle stated, “Scientific research into the oceans, including
the ocean bottoms, is perhaps the most significant of all relevant
activities,
because
it relates directly to improvement in all other uses and to invention of
new uses.” It is essential for land-locked nations to have access
to scientific knowledge in order to enjoy any benefits from the sea.
Because land-locked nations tend to be less developed, they are put at
a great disadvantage concerning exploiting sea-bed resources. Although
scientific research is a res communis commodity, it is normally
reserved for those developed nations with large budgets to fund expensive
projects. In response to this problem, some delegates, during the
Third UN Conference on the Law of the Sea, declared that, in order to increase
the benefits of the sea for all mankind, there should be free flow of data
on pure research, without restriction. For years, land-locked nations
have fought to ensure that they play a full part in the international sea-bed
regime and do not suffer because of their geographical situations.
The Law of the Sea Convention contains provisions specifically targeted
toward promoting the interests of land-locked States. Article 152
calls for the International Sea Bed Authority is to give special consideration
to land-locked States in helping them to overcome obstacles arising
from their location and the remoteness of the Area and difficulty accessing
it. The Law of the Sea Convention also allows for six members on
the Council to be elected among land-locked developing nations (Churchill
1983: 319).
Although the Law of the Sea Convention calls for a more equitable utilization of the ocean's resources, the quest by land-locked Sates for free and equal access is not finished. The Convention will help facilitate their ability to make arrangements with their coastal neighbors to exercise their right to access the seas. However, land-locked States must continue to negotiate for greater rights whenever possible. In the future, the ocean's resources will become more important to the lives of all citizens of the world community. Land-locked developing States must establish their rights concerning research and usage of the these resources.