Summer Undergraduate Research Initiative

The College of Education’s Summer Undergraduate Research Initiative provides undergraduate students with an opportunity to pursue advanced research projects for eight weeks over the summer. 

This program is designed to support undergraduate students who are curious, self-motivated, and eager to take on meaningful scholarly work—working independently or in a group. Each project is guided by a College of Education faculty mentor and students can pursue their own research ideas or join a faculty-led research project.

Summer Undergraduate Research Initiative grants are awarded on a competitive basis to students whose applications demonstrate a strong understanding of the proposed work and show strong potential to successfully carry out the project.

About

  • There are two tracks for summer undergraduate researchers
    • Track 1: 20 hours/week over eight weeks
    • Track 2: 10 hours/week over eight weeks 
  • Projects are limited to a maximum of two students and two faculty mentors per project.
  • Student researchers receive $15/hour and the possibility of earning credit within their major. 

Award Information

  • Currently enrolled TU undergraduate student who will continue as an undergraduate student at TU in following fall semester 
  • The proposed project cannot be part of a regular class assignment, but it can be built from a project that originated in a course
  • Completion and submission of application requirements by the due date
  • Agreement to all responsibilities associated with the award
  • Student researchers receive $15/hour with the possibility to earn credit within their major. 
  • Faculty stipends listed below are the maximum available on a single project. If faculty work as a team (maximum of 2), the stipend must be split. 
    • Track 1 (20 hours/week): $2,000
    • Track 2 (10 hours/week): $1,000
  • It is the responsibility of both the student researcher(s) and faculty mentor to make a positive affirmation of the expectations of the summer research project.
  • Completion of designated weekly hours (based on track awarded) for eight weeks.
    • Track 1: 20 hours per week
    • Track 2: 10 hours per week
  • Students may enroll in a maximum of one 3-4 credit summer course and should limit other fixed commitments (jobs, internships, or volunteer work) to no more than 10 hours per week during the research period.
    • If there are extenuating circumstances (e.g., course prerequisites, ELEVATE program), the student and faculty mentor may request an exemption that includes an explanation and how the research requirements will still be met.
    • In some instances, a case may be made that voluntary engagements in the community or with an organization are part of a research process. It is the responsibility of the student to make a credible case in their project proposal that this engagement is essential to the research, the research aspects of the project are fully and substantively defined, and the result will be a meaningful research report meeting the scholarly, theoretical, and analytical standards of the project’s discipline. The proposal must also include the maximum number of hours per week that would be for volunteer engagements and on scholarly research and analysis.
  • Submission of a written report to the faculty mentor for review and the final version emailed to the COE Dean’s Office by September 30. There is no set length, but the report should reflect the scope of the research completed. 
  • A public presentation of the project and results at an existing TU student research event or an event created for the presentation by the second Friday of October of the award calendar year.
  • Student researcher shall complete any requested informational surveys connected with their project.
  • Complete any requested informational surveys connected with their project.
  • Complete any media requests (photos, videos, interviews) connected to the project to be used for TU News, social media, news outlets, website, and other purposes.
  • It is the responsibility of both the student researcher(s) and faculty mentor to make a positive affirmation of the expectations of the summer research project.
  • Work with the student directly and communicate a minimum of three times a week during the award period to advise the student and to assess progress.
  • Review the final report before it’s submitted to the COE Dean’s Office to confirm grant terms are fulfilled regarding research hours and outcomes 
  • Certify the student researcher(s) completion of the project according to:
    • aspects of the proposal
    • work accomplished in association with time commitment
    • delivery of written report/analysis or creative product (as applicable)
    • public presentation on the project
  • Ensure student researcher(s) receive co-author credit if the results are part of a group or faculty-led project.
    • If the faculty mentor does not feel the credit is earned after the completion of the project, an exception must be granted by the department chair and chair of the COE Faculty Development and Research Committee (FDRC).
  • A description of the project
  • A brief narrative of the background literature with relevant references
  • Strategies to be used or methods for conducting the research project
  • The student's background or preparation for the project
  • Schedule of work planned 
  • If students and/or faculty are working in a group, an additional paragraph of the individual roles, expected contributions, and benefits should be clearly delineated and submitted with the application. 
  • If an exemption to the summer course enrollment and 10-hour/week work obligation limit is needed, explain why the exemption is needed and how both the student researcher and faculty mentor will fulfill all requirements of the research (see bullet 3 in Student Responsibilities).
  • If additional funds are available, an additional $200 may be offered to the student for supplies. A budget and explanation of the need and purpose of materials for the project will be required at the time of application.
  • Evidence of IRB or IACUC approval or status, if applicable.

Go to application form.


Contact

For questions, contact the College of Education Office of Research and Evaluation at .

Past Recipients

  • Paige Carmean
    • A Content Analysis of Scripted Literacy Curriculum
    • Faculty Mentor: Stephanie Moody, ECED 
  • Aniyah Castro
    • Empowering Educadores Bilingües using Virtual Reality (VR) with Artificial Intelligence (AI) Feedback
    • Faculty Mentor: Judith Cruzado-Guerrero, ELED
  • Finley Curtis
    • Developing Critical Reflective Practices as a Means for Socially Just Instruction
    • Faculty Mentor: Bethany Rice, ELED
  • Alyssa Geddie
    • Teaching on the Line: How Educators Are Navigating Culturally Responsive Practices in Politically Charged Times
    • Faculty Mentor: Deneen Dixon-Payne, ELED 
  • Emily Kipfer
    • Digital Beginnings: Examining Technology’s Impact on Early Cognitive Development
    • Faculty Mentor: LeaAnn Christenson, ECED
  • Kaitlyn McNerney
    • Empowering Educators to Foster Creativity in a Robotics-Enhanced Summer Camp
    • Faculty Mentor: Vicky Cai, LTDM
  • Kathlyn Wilson
    • Retention Decisions for Early Career Black Educators
    • Faculty Mentor: Danielle Sutherland, SMED
  • Isabella DeRegis
    • Teacher Candidate Choices in Linguistically Diverse Writing Instruction
    • Faculty Mentors: Pamela Hickey and Vicki McQuitty ELED
  • Myah Porter
    • InSpECTing & Reflecting: A Self-Study of Preservice Computational Thinking Knowledge and Teaching Skills
    • Faculty Mentor: Kandace Hoppin, SPED
  • Sujata Regmi
    • Future STEM Leaders: Cultivating Confidence and Skills in Girls through Project-Based Coding Clubs
    • Faculty Mentor: Hoda Harati, LTDM
  • Arianna Snead and Kathlyn Wilson
    • Exploring Culturally Responsive Education: A Pre-service Teacher's Autoethnographic Journey
    • Faculty Mentor: Deneen Dixon-Payne, ELED
  • Gabriel Thomas
    • Empowering Transition: Exploring Factors Shaping Post-Secondary Paths for Students with Disabilities
    • Faculty Mentors: Briella Baer Chen and Gregory Knollman, SPED
  • Brooke Buchner
    • ECSE Access Creating Accessible Degree Pathways for the Maryland Child Care Workforce
    • Faculty Mentor: Amy Noggle, ECED
  • Amina Carter
    • Where Have the Black Teachers Gone? A Look into the College Majors of Black Undergraduate Students
    • Faculty Mentor: Laura Jacobs, SMED
  • Marieta Davis
    • From Learner to Educator: An Autoethnographic Exploration of Pedagogical Implications in Social Studies
    • Faculty Mentor: Deneen Dixon-Payne, ELED
  • Isabella DeRegis
    • Surfacing Teacher Candidates' Writing Knowledge
    • Faculty Mentors: Pamela Hickey and Vicki McQuitty, ELED
  • Isabella DeRegis
    • Emotional Impact of Science Textbooks
    • Faculty Mentor: Brian Miller, ELED
  • Lindzie Gordon
    • Applying Mixed Methods to Evaluate and Improve Special Educator Preparation
    • Faculty Mentors: Briella Baer Chen, Kay Holman and Gregory Knollman, SPED
  • David Kuriny
    • What’s the Buzz? Gauging Social Media Integration into Teaching English Language Arts (ELA) Skills and Content
    • Faculty Mentor: Laura Jacobs, SMED
  • Julia Murphy
    • Analyzing Computational Thinking Content and Literature in Special Education
    • Faculty Mentor: Rachel Billman, SPED
  • Maggie Rink
    • Effects of technology enhanced pedagogy on teacher candidates’ knowledge and skills for communicating meaningful feedback to learners
    • Faculty Mentors: Sara Hooks and Jennifer Pett, ECED
  • Alisha Saine
    • Promoting Engagement and Advocacy in Undergraduate Teacher Preparation
    • Faculty Mentors: Sara Hooks, Jennifer Pett and Ocie Watson-Thompson, ECED
  • Adetokunbo Adekoga
    • Computer Science Education and Marginalized Learners: A Focus on Pre-service Teachers
    • Faculty Mentor: Qing Li, LTDM
  • Viktorria McCormick
    • Promoting Equity with Marginalized Learners through Enhanced Computational Thinking Skills
    • Faculty Mentor: Qing Li, LTDM
  • Melissa Perla
    • Inviting Code-meshing into Children’s Writing
    • Faculty Mentors: Pamela Hickey and Vicki McQuitty, ELED
  • Ariana Bennaim
    • Computational Thinking and Special Education Teacher Preparation
    • Faculty Mentor: Rachel Billman, SPED
  • Joshua Betz
    • Piloting and Iteration of the Comprehensive Autism Resource Environment (CARE) Application in the Pediatric Emergency Department
    • Faculty Mentor: Jenny Kouo, SPED
  • AJ Malicdem
    • Critical Analysis of Pre-service Teachers Global/Multicultural Text Set Projects
    • Faculty Mentor: Perpie Liwanag, ELED
  • Amy Penn
    • Writing Conferences with Linguistically Diverse Elementary Students
    • Faculty Mentors: Pamela Hickey and Vicki McQuitty, ELED
  • Taylor Brown and Brianna Staples
    • Teacher Candidates Preparation through Syllabi Research and Strengthening the Alignment of Curriculum/Methods of Instruction for Students with Disabilities (PreK-12) and Universal Design for Learning: Addressing Learner Variability
    • Faculty Mentor: Jenny Kouo, SPED
  • Alexis Hahn and Sarah Morton
    • Supporting Students with an Autism Spectrum Disorder in Engineering: Building an Inclusive Curriculum that Cultivates Engineering Dispositions and Other Collateral Skills
    • Faculty Mentor: Jenny Kouo, SPED
  • Laura Eichhorn and Jenna Jaeger
    • Sentiment Analysis of Educational Textbooks
    • Faculty Mentor: Brian Miller, ELED
  • Ember Hannesson and Brianna Staples
    • The Use of Global & Multicultural Literature to Enhance the Teaching of Literacy
    • Faculty Mentor: Perpie Liwanag, ELED